- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Moto G50 5G vs Galaxy A32
Motorola Moto G50 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A32
What Moto G50 5G does better (4) and where Galaxy A32 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Display7.0
4.2Camera7.1
4.0Battery4.0
5.6Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G50 5GGalaxy A32
| Moto G50 5G | Galaxy A32 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167 mm | 158.9 mm | +8.1 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 73.6 mm | +2.8 mm |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 8.4 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 206 g | 184 g | +22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G50 5G better than Galaxy A32?
- 5GYes · Galaxy A32: No
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Process7 nm vs 12 nm+71%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Galaxy A32 better than Moto G50 5G?
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- OLED panelNo · Moto G50 5G: Yes
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 411 ppi+53%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Moto G50 5G: Yes
- Weight206 g vs 184 g+12%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 20 MP+54%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Thickness9.3 mm vs 8.4 mm+11%
- Screen-to-body ratio80.5% vs 84.6%+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 206 g | 184 g |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 167 mm | 158.9 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 73.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Meteorite Grey | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 411 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 814 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.5% | 84.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 286,666 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,277 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 25% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.45 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 5 |
Related comparisons
vs
OnePlus Nord N200 5GvsMotorola Moto G50 5G
5.55.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A32
7.45.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A13vsSamsung Galaxy A32
4.85.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A73 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A32
8.05.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A33 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A32
7.15.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A23vsSamsung Galaxy A32
5.95.8

