- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Moto G20 vs Galaxy A22 5G
Motorola Moto G20 vs Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
What Moto G20 does better (2) and where Galaxy A22 5G wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.5Display4.3
5.7Camera5.3
3.5Battery4.0
5.6Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G20Galaxy A22 5G
| Moto G20 | Galaxy A22 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.2 mm | 167.2 mm | −2 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 76.4 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 203 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G20 better than Galaxy A22 5G?
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Galaxy A22 5G better than Moto G20?
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Wired charging10 W vs 15 W+50%
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 399 ppi+48%
- CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+22%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 9 mm |
| Height | 165.2 mm | 167.2 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Colours | Breeze Blue, Flamingo Pink | Gray, White, Mint, Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 399 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 380 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 385 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.6% | 82.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T700 | Mediatek Dimensity 700 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G52 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 242,155 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 6,913 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 320 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 23% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.73 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI core 5 |
Related comparisons
vs
OnePlus Nord N200 5GvsMotorola Moto G20
5.55.6
vs
Motorola Moto G20vsOPPO A94
5.65.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G
4.45.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A22 5GvsXiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
5.95.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A31vsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G
5.85.9
vs
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G
6.15.9