- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Moto G Stylus (2022) vs Pova 4
Motorola Moto G Stylus (2022) vs Tecno Pova 4
What Moto G Stylus (2022) does better (6) and where Pova 4 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Display4.4
6.6Camera4.6
3.5Battery7.0
3.5Features5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G Stylus (2022)Pova 4
| Moto G Stylus (2022) | Pova 4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 170.2 mm | 170.6 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 77.5 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | 8.7 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 216 g | 214 g | +2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G Stylus (2022) better than Pova 4?
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 257 ppi+54%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova 4: No
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Pova 4 better than Moto G Stylus (2022)?
- Wired charging10 W vs 18 W+80%
- NFCNo · Moto G Stylus (2022): Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Moto G Stylus (2022): Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Dual SIMNo · Moto G Stylus (2022): Yes
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
- Thickness9.5 mm vs 8.7 mm+9%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 216 g | 214 g |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | 8.7 mm |
| Height | 170.2 mm | 170.6 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 77.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Twilight Blue, Metallic Rose | Cryolite Blue, Uranolith Grey |
| Stylus | Yes | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 257 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.6% | 84.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 540,584 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,640 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 343 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 25% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HiOS 12 |
