- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Moto G (2023) vs Galaxy M14
Motorola Moto G (2023) vs Samsung Galaxy M14
What Moto G (2023) does better (5) and where Galaxy M14 wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.8Display4.9
3.3Performance4.6
3.9Camera5.2
4.0Battery7.5
6.2Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto G (2023)Galaxy M14
| Moto G (2023) | Galaxy M14 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 166.8 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 77.2 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.4 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 206 g | −17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto G (2023) better than Galaxy M14?
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy M14: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Weight189 g vs 206 g+9%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 9.4 mm+12%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Galaxy M14 better than Moto G (2023)?
- Wired charging15 W vs 25 W+67%
- RAM4 GB vs 6 GB+50%
- AnTuTu score499,266 vs 607,489+22%
- NFCNo · Moto G (2023): Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 400 ppi+48%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,816 vs 1,963+8%
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Dual SIMNo · Moto G (2023): Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Process8 nm vs 5 nm+60%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.4 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 166.8 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 77.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Ink Blue | Navy Blue, Light Blue, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.9% | 81.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Exynos 1330 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MP2 |
| AnTuTu score | 499,266 | 607,489 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,816 | 1,963 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 364 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | 30% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.48 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | My UX | One UI core 5.1 |
Related comparisons
vs
Motorola Moto G (2025)vsMotorola Moto G (2023)
6.95.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy M35vsSamsung Galaxy M14
8.36.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy M14vsXiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
6.76.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy M14vsTecno Spark 20 Pro
6.76.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy M15vsSamsung Galaxy M14
7.16.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy M55vsSamsung Galaxy M14
8.56.7