- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Moto E7 vs Galaxy XCover Pro
Motorola Moto E7 vs Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
What Moto E7 does better (5) and where Galaxy XCover Pro wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.1Display4.1
3.2Camera5.7
2.4Battery2.8
2.4Features6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto E7Galaxy XCover Pro
| Moto E7 | Galaxy XCover Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.9 mm | 159.9 mm | +5 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 76.7 mm | −1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 10 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 218 g | −38 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto E7 better than Galaxy XCover Pro?
- Main camera48 MP vs 25 MP+92%
- Weight180 g vs 218 g+21%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.3″+3%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 10 mm+12%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.3% vs 79.4%+4%
Why is Galaxy XCover Pro better than Moto E7?
- Wired charging10 W vs 15 W+50%
- NFCNo · Moto E7: Yes
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 409 ppi+52%
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 13 MP2.6×
- Storage (base)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Moto E7: Yes
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+15%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
- Process12 nm vs 10 nm+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 218 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 10 mm |
| Height | 164.9 mm | 159.9 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Mineral Gray, Aqua Blue, Satin Coral | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.3″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.3% | 79.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 | Exynos 9611 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 25 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,050 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 15 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.47 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 5 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A02svsMotorola Moto E7
3.73.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy M01vsMotorola Moto E7
3.93.8
vs
Motorola Moto E7vsNokia 8000 4G
3.83.8
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9SvsSamsung Galaxy XCover Pro
5.05.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy XCover ProvsInfinix Note 7
5.15.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy XCover ProvsMotorola Moto G Power
5.15.2