- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Moto E30 vs Galaxy A32 5G
Motorola Moto E30 vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
What Moto E30 does better (2) and where Galaxy A32 5G wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.5Display2.4
3.9Camera6.3
3.5Battery4.0
2.0Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Moto E30Galaxy A32 5G
| Moto E30 | Galaxy A32 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.1 mm | 164.2 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 76.1 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 9.1 mm | = |
| Weight | 198 g | 205 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Moto E30 better than Galaxy A32 5G?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- Weight198 g vs 205 g+4%
Why is Galaxy A32 5G better than Moto E30?
- RAM2 GB vs 8 GB4×
- Storage (max)32 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Wired charging10 W vs 15 W+50%
- 5GNo · Moto E30: Yes
- NFCNo · Moto E30: Yes
- Storage (base)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Moto E30: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz+11%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 165.1 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Mineral gray, Digital blue | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 270 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 497 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.7% | 81.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T700 | Mediatek Dimensity 720 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G52 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 226,561 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,673 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 362 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 23% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.26 W/kg | 0.33 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 5 |
Related comparisons
vs
Motorola Moto E30vsXiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021
4.44.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A12
5.24.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A31vsSamsung Galaxy A32 5G
5.85.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsInfinix Note 10
5.25.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsTecno Spark 7 Pro
5.25.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsRealme C25
5.25.1

