- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Edge 60 vs Reno13 FS 5G
Motorola Edge 60 vs OPPO Reno13 FS 5G
What Edge 60 does better (11) and where Reno13 FS 5G wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Display9.3
9.1Camera8.8
7.5Battery8.1
8.5Features9.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Edge 60Reno13 FS 5G
| Edge 60 | Reno13 FS 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.2 mm | 162.2 mm | −1 mm |
| Width | 73.1 mm | 75 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 179 g | 192 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Edge 60 better than Reno13 FS 5G?
- Telephoto cameraYes · Reno13 FS 5G: No
- eSIMYes · Reno13 FS 5G: No
- Dual SIMYes · Reno13 FS 5G: No
- Energy classA vs B
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+18%
- Pixel density446 ppi vs 394 ppi+13%
- Weight179 g vs 192 g+7%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Resolution (width)1,220 px vs 1,080 px+13%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.1+6%
Why is Reno13 FS 5G better than Edge 60?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 180 Hz+50%
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,800 mAh+12%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx9+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 179 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 161.2 mm | 162.2 mm |
| Width | 73.1 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP69 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx9 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | Pantone: Gibraltar sea, Shamrock, Plum perfect | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,220 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,712 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 446 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 180 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,401 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.1% | 92.2% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 - Global | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | 661,808 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,999 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 850 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,800 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 13.5 h | — |
| Wired charging | 68 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 76% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -22.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | proximity, accelerometer, gyro |
| SAR (head) | 0.95 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | Hello UI | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | B |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 59 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
