dotrising.com
Compare
Edge 40 Pro vs Y200 GT

Motorola Edge 40 Pro vs Vivo Y200 GT

What Edge 40 Pro does better (18) and where Y200 GT wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2023Edge 40 Pro

9.0Score

18 advantages≈ $250

Higher score

Vivo · 2024Y200 GT

8.8Score

6 advantages≈ $250

8.6Display9.7

9.1Camera6.1

7.1Battery8.9

9.0Features7.5

Dimensions

Size comparison

Edge 40 ProY200 GT

	Edge 40 Pro	Y200 GT	Difference
Height	161.2 mm	163.7 mm	−2.5 mm
Width	74 mm	75.9 mm	−1.9 mm
Thickness	8.6 mm	8 mm	+0.6 mm
Weight	199 g	195 g	+4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Edge 40 Pro better than Y200 GT?

Wired charging125 W vs 80 W+56%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
Optical stabilisationYes · Y200 GT: No
Telephoto cameraYes · Y200 GT: No
Wireless chargingYes · Y200 GT: No
Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
Rear cameras3 vs 13×
Selfie camera60 MP vs 16 MP3.8×
Charged in 30 min250% vs 58%4.3×
CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 2.63 GHz+22%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Y200 GT: No

Why is Y200 GT better than Edge 40 Pro?

Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 4,500 nits3.5×
Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+30%
Pixel density394 ppi vs 453 ppi+15%
Weight199 g vs 195 g+2%
Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
Thickness8.6 mm vs 8 mm+7%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Edge 40 Pro≈ $2509.0	Vivo Y200 GT≈ $2508.8
Design
Weight	199 g	195 g
Thickness	8.6 mm	8 mm
Height	161.2 mm	163.7 mm
Width	74 mm	75.9 mm
Frame	Aluminium	—
Back	Glass	—
Ingress protection	IP68	IP64
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx4
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus	—
Colours	Interstellar Black, Lunar Blue	Black, Blue
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.8″
Panel	OLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,260 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,800 px
Pixel density	394 ppi	453 ppi
Refresh rate	165 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	1,300 nits	4,500 nits
Measured brightness	1,050 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	90.5%	89.3%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2	Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.2 GHz	2.63 GHz
GPU	Adreno 740	Adreno 720
AnTuTu score	1,273,764	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,896	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	3,631	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.55"	1/1.95"
Rear cameras	3	1
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	2×	—
Max video	8K	4K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	30 fps
Selfie camera	60 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,600 mAh	6,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	—
Wired charging	125 W	80 W
Charged in 30 min	250%	58%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	15 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.3	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3.2	2
Video output	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-22.6 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	My UX	OriginOS 4
Major OS updates promised	3	—