- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Edge (2025) vs V50 Lite 4G
Motorola Edge (2025) vs Vivo V50 Lite 4G
What Edge (2025) does better (20) and where V50 Lite 4G wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display8.6
9.1Camera5.9
8.4Battery9.2
9.6Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Edge (2025)V50 Lite 4G
| Edge (2025) | V50 Lite 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.2 mm | 163.8 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Width | 73.1 mm | 76.3 mm | −3.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 181 g | 196 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Edge (2025) better than V50 Lite 4G?
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,800 nits2.5×
- Optical stabilisationYes · V50 Lite 4G: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · V50 Lite 4G: No
- Wireless chargingYes · V50 Lite 4G: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · V50 Lite 4G: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · V50 Lite 4G: No
- eSIMYes · V50 Lite 4G: No
- Pixel density444 ppi vs 388 ppi+14%
Why is V50 Lite 4G better than Edge (2025)?
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+25%
- Wired charging68 W vs 90 W+32%
- Memory card slotNo · Edge (2025): Yes
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+8%
- Thickness8 mm vs 7.8 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 181 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 161.2 mm | 163.8 mm |
| Width | 73.1 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Eco leather | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | Deep Forest | Blue/Silver, Violet, Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | P-OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,220 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,712 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 444 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92% | 88.7% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultra | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 981,681 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,070 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 75% | 56% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | Funtouch 15 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 58 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Motorola Edge (2025)vsTecno Pova 7 Ultra
9.19.0
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)vsMotorola Edge (2025)
9.39.1
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro (China)vsMotorola Edge (2025)
9.19.1
vs
Motorola Edge (2025)vsMotorola Edge (2024)
9.18.8
vs
Motorola Edge (2025)vsMotorola Edge (2023)
9.18.4
vs
Motorola Edge (2025)vsTel.Me. T909


