- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Edge 20 Lite vs Galaxy A22 5G
Motorola Edge 20 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
What Edge 20 Lite does better (9) and where Galaxy A22 5G wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display4.3
7.6Camera5.3
5.5Battery4.0
5.6Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Edge 20 LiteGalaxy A22 5G
| Edge 20 Lite | Galaxy A22 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.9 mm | 167.2 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 76.4 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 203 g | −18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Edge 20 Lite better than Galaxy A22 5G?
- Main camera108 MP vs 48 MP2.2×
- Wired charging30 W vs 15 W2×
- OLED panelYes · Galaxy A22 5G: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Weight185 g vs 203 g+10%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 9 mm+8%
- Screen-to-body ratio87.4% vs 82.3%+6%
Why is Galaxy A22 5G better than Edge 20 Lite?
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 399 ppi+4%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9 mm |
| Height | 165.9 mm | 167.2 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Colours | Electric Graphite, Lagoon Green | Gray, White, Mint, Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | OLED | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 399 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 380 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 385 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.4% | 82.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 | Mediatek Dimensity 700 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 242,155 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 6,913 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 320 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/2" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 23% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.73 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI core 5 |
Related comparisons
vs
Motorola Edge 20 LitevsOPPO Reno6 5G
7.27.1
vs
Motorola Edge 20 LitevsOPPO Reno6
7.27.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G
4.45.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A22 5GvsXiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
5.95.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A31vsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G
5.85.9
vs
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G
6.15.9

