- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Lucky 08 vs Camon 30 Pro
Meizu Lucky 08 vs Tecno Camon 30 Pro
What Lucky 08 does better (7) and where Camon 30 Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display9.5
5.9Camera9.1
8.3Battery7.2
8.1Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Lucky 08Camon 30 Pro
| Lucky 08 | Camon 30 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163 mm | 164 mm | −1 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 74.5 mm | +3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 202 g | 189 g | +13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Lucky 08 better than Camon 30 Pro?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Stereo speakersYes · Camon 30 Pro: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Memory card slotYes · Camon 30 Pro: No
- Pixel density450 ppi vs 393 ppi+15%
- Resolution (width)1,264 px vs 1,080 px+17%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.9+12%
Why is Camon 30 Pro better than Lucky 08?
- Wired charging45 W vs 70 W+56%
- Optical stabilisationNo · Lucky 08: Yes
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 50 MP6.2×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+29%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Lucky 08: Yes
- Weight202 g vs 189 g+7%
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 7.7 mm+12%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 163 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 74.5 mm |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Colours | Black, White | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Alps Snowy Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,264 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,780 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 998 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.5% | 89.9% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 949,357 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,931 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,727 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.5 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 64% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Flyme AIOS | Android 14 |
| Platform | Other | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
