- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 21 Pro vs 14 Pro
Meizu 21 Pro vs Xiaomi 14 Pro
What 21 Pro does better (3) and where 14 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
21 Pro14 Pro
| 21 Pro | 14 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165 mm | 161.4 mm | +3.6 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 75.3 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.5 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 208 g | 223 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 21 Pro better than 14 Pro?
- Battery capacity5,050 mAh vs 4,880 mAh+3%
- Weight208 g vs 223 g+7%
- Thickness8 mm vs 8.5 mm+6%
Why is 14 Pro better than 21 Pro?
- Peak brightness1,250 nits vs 3,000 nits2.4×
- Wired charging80 W vs 120 W+50%
- 4K selfie videoNo · 21 Pro: Yes
- Optical zoom3× vs 3.2×+7%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.4+36%
- Resolution (width)1,368 px vs 1,440 px+5%
- Screen-to-body ratio87.4% vs 89.6%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 208 g | 223 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 165 mm | 161.4 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Titanium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Meizu Titan Glass 2.0 | Shatterproof glass |
| Colours | Black, White, Blue, Green, Gray | Black, Silver, Titanium, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,368 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,192 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 512 ppi | 522 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,250 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,037 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.4% | 89.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,397,671 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 6,906 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,526 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.4 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.31" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 3.2× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,050 mAh | 4,880 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 167% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | 50 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2 |
| USB version | — | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Satellite messaging | — | Yes |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Flyme OS / Flyme AIOS 2 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Other | Android |
| Interface | Flyme | HyperOS |
