How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. 21 Pro vs X200 Pro

Meizu 21 Pro vs Vivo X200 Pro

What 21 Pro does better (6) and where X200 Pro wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Meizu 21 Pro
Meizu · 202421 Pro
9.3Score
6 advantages≈ $690
vs
Vivo X200 Pro
Vivo · 2024X200 Pro
9.6Score
10 advantages≈ $670
Higher score
8.5Display9.1
9.4Camera9.7
9.0Battery8.9
9.3Features9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

21 ProX200 Pro
74.4 × 165876 × 162.48.2
21 ProX200 ProDifference
Height165 mm162.4 mm+2.6 mm
Width74.4 mm76 mm−1.6 mm
Thickness8 mm8.2 mm−0.2 mm
Weight208 g223 g−15 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 21 Pro better than X200 Pro?

  1. Pixel density512 ppi vs 452 ppi+13%
  2. Weight208 g vs 223 g+7%
  3. Wireless charging power50 W vs 30 W+67%
  4. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  5. Resolution (width)1,368 px vs 1,260 px+9%
  6. Thickness8 mm vs 8.2 mm+2%

Why is X200 Pro better than 21 Pro?

  1. Peak brightness1,250 nits vs 4,500 nits3.6×
  2. Battery capacity5,050 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+19%
  3. Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
  4. Optical zoom3× vs 3.7×+23%
  5. 4K selfie videoNo · 21 Pro: Yes
  6. eSIMNo · 21 Pro: Yes
  7. CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+10%
  8. Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
  9. Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
  10. Screen-to-body ratio87.4% vs 90.3%+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Meizu 21 ProMeizu 21 Pro≈ $6909.3
Vivo X200 ProVivo X200 Pro≈ $6709.6
Design
Weight208 g223 g
Thickness8 mm8.2 mm
Height165 mm162.4 mm
Width74.4 mm76 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionMeizu Titan Glass 2.0Scratch/drop-resistant glass (Armor Glass)
ColoursBlack, White, Blue, Green, GrayCosmos Black, Titanium Grey, Blue, White
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,368 px1,260 px
Resolution (height)3,192 px2,800 px
Pixel density512 ppi452 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,250 nits4,500 nits
Measured brightness—1,881 nits
Screen-to-body ratio87.4%90.3%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3Mediatek Dimensity 9400
Chip makerQualcommMediaTek
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.3 GHz3.63 GHz
GPUAdreno 750Immortalis-G925
AnTuTu score—2,609,095
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—8,152
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—6,173
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.3"1/1.28"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3×3.7×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate—120 fps
Selfie camera32 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,050 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery type—Si/C
Active use (test)—15.2 h
Wired charging80 W90 W
Charged in 30 min—73%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power50 W30 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 3.2
USB version—3.2
Video output—Yes
Satellite messaging—Yes
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display, ultrasonic
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)—0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launchFlyme OS / Flyme AIOS 2Android 15
PlatformOtherAndroid
InterfaceFlymeFuntouch 15 (International)
Major OS updates promised—4
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare