- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 21 Pro vs X100s Pro
Meizu 21 Pro vs Vivo X100s Pro
What 21 Pro does better (4) and where X100s Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
21 ProX100s Pro
| 21 Pro | X100s Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165 mm | 164.1 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 75.3 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 208 g | 224 g | −16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 21 Pro better than X100s Pro?
- Pixel density512 ppi vs 453 ppi+13%
- Weight208 g vs 224 g+8%
- Thickness8 mm vs 8.9 mm+11%
- Resolution (width)1,368 px vs 1,260 px+9%
Why is X100s Pro better than 21 Pro?
- Peak brightness1,250 nits vs 3,000 nits2.4×
- Battery capacity5,050 mAh vs 5,400 mAh+7%
- Wired charging80 W vs 100 W+25%
- Optical zoom3× vs 4.3×+43%
- 4K selfie videoNo · 21 Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio87.4% vs 89.8%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 208 g | 224 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 165 mm | 164.1 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Meizu Titan Glass 2.0 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Black, White, Blue, Green, Gray | Titanium, White, Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,368 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,192 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 512 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,250 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.4% | 89.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,432,004 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 7,436 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,370 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | 1/0.98" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 4.3× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,050 mAh | 5,400 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 100 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 125% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | 50 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | — | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Flyme OS / Flyme AIOS 2 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Other | Android |
| Interface | Flyme | OriginOS 4 |
