- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 21 Note vs Poco X6 Pro
Meizu 21 Note vs Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
What 21 Note does better (9) and where Poco X6 Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display8.6
8.8Camera8.4
8.2Battery5.3
8.3Features6.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
21 NotePoco X6 Pro
| 21 Note | Poco X6 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 160.5 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Width | 76.9 mm | 74.3 mm | +2.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 186 g | +19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 21 Note better than Poco X6 Pro?
- Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 1,800 nits2.8×
- Stereo speakersYes · Poco X6 Pro: No
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+10%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Max video8K vs 4K
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
- Resolution (width)1,264 px vs 1,220 px+4%
Why is Poco X6 Pro better than 21 Note?
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Wired charging65 W vs 67 W+3%
- Weight205 g vs 186 g+10%
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 186 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 160.5 mm |
| Width | 76.9 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Silicone polymer |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, White | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,264 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,780 px | 2,712 px |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,148 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5% | 90.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,396,547 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,696 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.8 h |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 67% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Flyme OS | Android 14 |
| Platform | Other | Android |
| Interface | Flyme AIOS | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
