- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 21 Note vs Galaxy M35
Meizu 21 Note vs Samsung Galaxy M35
What 21 Note does better (18) and where Galaxy M35 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display7.4
8.8Camera8.0
8.2Battery7.5
8.3Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
21 NoteGalaxy M35
| 21 Note | Galaxy M35 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 162.3 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Width | 76.9 mm | 78.6 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 9.1 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 222 g | −17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 21 Note better than Galaxy M35?
- Wired charging65 W vs 25 W2.6×
- RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 1,000 nits5×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+33%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Max video8K vs 4K
- Pixel density450 ppi vs 390 ppi+15%
- Weight205 g vs 222 g+8%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+3%
- Process4 nm vs 5 nm+25%
Why is Galaxy M35 better than 21 Note?
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+9%
- Memory card slotNo · 21 Note: Yes
- 4K selfie videoNo · 21 Note: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 222 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 162.3 mm |
| Width | 76.9 mm | 78.6 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Black, White | Dark Blue, Light Blue, Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | LTPO OLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,264 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,780 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5% | 83.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Exynos 1380 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 768,538 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,758 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.96" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 52% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.31 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Flyme OS | Android 14 |
| Platform | Other | Android |
| Interface | Flyme AIOS | One UI 8.5 |
