- dotrising.com
- Compare
- V50 ThinQ 5G vs Xperia 5 II
LG V50 ThinQ 5G vs Sony Xperia 5 II
What V50 ThinQ 5G does better (6) and where Xperia 5 II wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.7Display7.1
5.3Camera8.6
3.1Battery2.9
8.4Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
V50 ThinQ 5GXperia 5 II
| V50 ThinQ 5G | Xperia 5 II | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.2 mm | 158 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 68 mm | +8.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 183 g | 163 g | +20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V50 ThinQ 5G better than Xperia 5 II?
- Wireless chargingYes · Xperia 5 II: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Pixel density537 ppi vs 449 ppi+20%
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.1″+5%
- Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,080 px+33%
- Screen-to-body ratio83% vs 80.9%+3%
Why is Xperia 5 II better than V50 ThinQ 5G?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraNo · V50 ThinQ 5G: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Wired charging18 W vs 21 W+17%
- Optical zoom2× vs 3×+50%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 120 fps4×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · V50 ThinQ 5G: Yes
- Dual SIMNo · V50 ThinQ 5G: Yes
- Weight183 g vs 163 g+12%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 8 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 183 g | 163 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 159.2 mm | 158 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 68 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Colours | Black | Black, Grey, Blue, Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.1″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,120 px | 2,520 px |
| Pixel density | 537 ppi | 449 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 550 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83% | 80.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 532,655 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,301 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,104 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 21 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer, fingerprint | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
