- dotrising.com
- Compare
- K22 vs Galaxy A01 Core
LG K22 vs Samsung Galaxy A01 Core
What K22 does better (7) and where Galaxy A01 Core wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.3Display2.8
2.7Camera2.3
2.4Features2.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
K22Galaxy A01 Core
| K22 | Galaxy A01 Core | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 155.7 mm | 141.7 mm | +14 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 67.5 mm | +7.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 170 g | 150 g | +20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is K22 better than Galaxy A01 Core?
- Main camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- RAM3 GB vs 2 GB+50%
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Storage (base)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Screen size6.2″ vs 5.3″+17%
- Screen-to-body ratio81.7% vs 74.5%+10%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 8.6 mm+2%
Why is Galaxy A01 Core better than K22?
- CPU frequency1.3 GHz vs 1.5 GHz+15%
- Pixel density271 ppi vs 311 ppi+15%
- Weight170 g vs 150 g+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 170 g | 150 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 155.7 mm | 141.7 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 67.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Titan, Blue | Black, Blue, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.2″ | 5.3″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,520 px | 1,480 px |
| Pixel density | 271 ppi | 311 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.7% | 74.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm QM215 Snapdragon 215 | Mediatek MT6739 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| CPU cores | 4 | 4 |
| CPU frequency | 1.3 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 308 | PowerVR GE8100 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 3 GB | 2 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage (base) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/2.2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/3.1" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,000 mAh | 3,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.64 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 (Go edition) |
| Platform | Android | Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A03 CorevsSamsung Galaxy A01 Core
3.74.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A01 CorevsHuawei Y7p
4.04.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A01 CorevsRealme C3 (3 cameras)
4.04.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A01 CorevsHuawei Y8s
4.04.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A01 CorevsHuawei P40 lite E
4.04.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A01 CorevsNokia C5 Endi
4.04.0