- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Super 26 Ultra vs Y300t
itel Super 26 Ultra vs Vivo Y300t
What Super 26 Ultra does better (10) and where Y300t wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display7.0
5.9Camera5.5
7.0Battery8.4
4.4Features6.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Super 26 UltraY300t
| Super 26 Ultra | Y300t | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 165.7 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 76.3 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 8.1 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Weight | 168 g | 204 g | −36 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Super 26 Ultra better than Y300t?
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,050 nits4.3×
- OLED panelYes · Y300t: No
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Weight168 g vs 204 g+21%
- Memory card slotYes · Y300t: No
- Screen-to-body ratio112.7% vs 86%+31%
- Thickness6.8 mm vs 8.1 mm+19%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
Why is Y300t better than Super 26 Ultra?
- Wired charging18 W vs 44 W2.4×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- 5GNo · Super 26 Ultra: Yes
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+8%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+14%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 6+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 168 g | 204 g |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | Silver, Blue, Gold, Silver/Gold | Black, White, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 1,050 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 112.7% | 86% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T7300 | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | OriginOS 5 |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5Gvsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.77.6
vs
Infinix Note 50 Pro 4Gvsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.77.6
vs
Infinix Hot 60 Provsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.67.6
vs
OPPO A5 Provsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.67.6
vs
Nothing CMF Phone 2 Provsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.87.6
vs
Infinix Note 50 4Gvsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.87.6


