- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Super 26 Ultra vs Galaxy M17
itel Super 26 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy M17
What Super 26 Ultra does better (10) and where Galaxy M17 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display7.3
5.9Camera7.8
7.0Battery5.3
4.4Features7.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Super 26 UltraGalaxy M17
| Super 26 Ultra | Galaxy M17 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 164.4 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 77.9 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 7.5 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 168 g | 192 g | −24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Super 26 Ultra better than Galaxy M17?
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,100 nits4.1×
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 90 Hz+60%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Weight168 g vs 192 g+14%
- Screen-to-body ratio112.7% vs 86%+31%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
- Thickness6.8 mm vs 7.5 mm+10%
Why is Galaxy M17 better than Super 26 Ultra?
- Optical stabilisationNo · Super 26 Ultra: Yes
- 5GNo · Super 26 Ultra: Yes
- Wired charging18 W vs 25 W+39%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Super 26 Ultra: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
- Process6 nm vs 5 nm+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 168 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Silver, Blue, Gold, Silver/Gold | Moonlight Silver, Sapphire Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 1,100 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 112.7% | 86% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T7300 | Exynos 1330 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Exynos |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G68 MP2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.64 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 7 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 6 |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5Gvsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.77.6
vs
Infinix Note 50 Pro 4Gvsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.77.6
vs
Infinix Hot 60 Provsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.67.6
vs
OPPO A5 Provsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.67.6
vs
Nothing CMF Phone 2 Provsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.87.6
vs
Infinix Note 50 4Gvsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.87.6


