- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Super 26 Ultra vs Narzo 90X
itel Super 26 Ultra vs Realme Narzo 90X
What Super 26 Ultra does better (11) and where Narzo 90X wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display7.3
5.9Camera4.6
7.0Battery8.9
4.4Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Super 26 UltraNarzo 90X
| Super 26 Ultra | Narzo 90X | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 166.1 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 77.9 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 8.3 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Weight | 168 g | 212 g | −44 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Super 26 Ultra better than Narzo 90X?
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,200 nits3.8×
- OLED panelYes · Narzo 90X: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- NFCYes · Narzo 90X: No
- Pixel density392 ppi vs 254 ppi+54%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Weight168 g vs 212 g+26%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio112.7% vs 87.4%+29%
- Thickness6.8 mm vs 8.3 mm+22%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
Why is Narzo 90X better than Super 26 Ultra?
- Wired charging18 W vs 60 W3.3×
- 5GNo · Super 26 Ultra: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Super 26 Ultra: Yes
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+17%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 168 g | 212 g |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 166.1 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Asahi Dragontrail Star D+ |
| Colours | Silver, Blue, Gold, Silver/Gold | Flash Blue, Nitro Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 1,570 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 1,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 112.7% | 87.4% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T7300 | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.96" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 60 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | realme UI 6.0 |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5Gvsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.77.6
vs
Infinix Note 50 Pro 4Gvsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.77.6
vs
Infinix Hot 60 Provsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.67.6
vs
OPPO A5 Provsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.67.6
vs
Nothing CMF Phone 2 Provsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.87.6
vs
Infinix Note 50 4Gvsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.87.6


