- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Super 26 Ultra vs WP35 Pro
itel Super 26 Ultra vs Oukitel WP35 Pro
What Super 26 Ultra does better (9) and where WP35 Pro wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display3.9
5.9Camera6.8
7.0Battery8.7
4.4Features7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Super 26 UltraWP35 Pro
| Super 26 Ultra | WP35 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 172.2 mm | −8.2 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 81 mm | −5.2 mm |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 15.2 mm | −8.4 mm |
| Weight | 168 g | 360 g | −192 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Super 26 Ultra better than WP35 Pro?
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 60 Hz2.4×
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 450 nits10×
- Weight168 g vs 360 g2.1×
- OLED panelYes · WP35 Pro: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Thickness6.8 mm vs 15.2 mm2.2×
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio112.7% vs 75.2%+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.9+19%
Why is WP35 Pro better than Super 26 Ultra?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 11,000 mAh+83%
- Wired charging18 W vs 33 W+83%
- 5GNo · Super 26 Ultra: Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Pixel density392 ppi vs 400 ppi+2%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 168 g | 360 g |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 15.2 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 172.2 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 81 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Silver, Blue, Gold, Silver/Gold | Black, Grey, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 112.7% | 75.2% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T7300 | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 11,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 121 h |
| Repairability class | — | A |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5Gvsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.77.6
vs
Infinix Note 50 Pro 4Gvsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.77.6
vs
Infinix Hot 60 Provsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.67.6
vs
OPPO A5 Provsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.67.6
vs
Nothing CMF Phone 2 Provsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.87.6
vs
Infinix Note 50 4Gvsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.87.6


