How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. A300C vs 215 4G (2026)

itel A300C vs Nokia 215 4G (2026)

What A300C does better (7) and where 215 4G (2026) wins (0) — every spec side by side.

itel A300C
itel · 2026A300C
5.0Score
7 advantages≈ $110
Higher score
vs
Nokia 215 4G (2026)
Nokia · 2026215 4G (2026)
0 advantages
4.2Display2.1

Why is A300C better than 215 4G (2026)?

  1. Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh4.1×
  2. RAM4 GB vs 0.062 GB64×
  3. Screen size6.6″ vs 2.8″2.4×
  4. Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
  5. Pixel density267 ppi vs 143 ppi+87%
  6. Resolution (width)720 px vs 240 px3×
  7. Selfie camera5 MP vs 0.3 MP16.7×

Why is 215 4G (2026) better than A300C?

215 4G (2026) has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

itel A300Citel A300C≈ $1105.0
Design
Weight—104 g
Thickness—12.8 mm
Height—128.8 mm
Width—55 mm
ColoursComet Orange, Lavender Purple, Classic Black, Silver MistBlack, Red
Display
Screen size6.6″2.8″
PanelIPS LCDTFT LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)720 px240 px
Resolution (height)1,612 px320 px
Pixel density267 ppi143 ppi
Refresh rate90 Hz60 Hz
Peak brightness480 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio—34.3%
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T7100—
Chip makerUnisoc—
CPU cores8—
CPU frequency1.8 GHz—
GPUPowerVR GE8322—
Memory
RAM4 GB0.062 GB
Storage (max)128 GB—
Storage (base)64 GB—
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera8 MP—
Rear cameras1—
Optical stabilisationNo—
Ultra-wide cameraNo—
Telephoto cameraNo—
Max video1080p—
Selfie camera5 MP0.3 MP
4K selfie videoNo—
Battery
Battery capacity6,000 mAh1,450 mAh
Battery type—Li-Ion
Wired charging18 W—
Wireless chargingNo—
Connectivity
5GNo—
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4—
Bluetooth—5
NFCNoNo
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C
Features
Stereo speakersNoNo
3.5 mm headphone jackYesYes
Fingerprint sensorSide—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometerNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16 (Go edition)—
PlatformAndroid—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare