How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. A200 vs PMP 92

itel A200 vs Peaq PMP 92

What A200 does better (5) and where PMP 92 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

itel A200
itel · 2026A200
5.1Score
5 advantages
Higher score
vs
Peaq PMP 92
Peaq · 2026PMP 92
1 advantage≈ $40
2.7Camera3.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

A200PMP 92
70 × 1708.354 × 11515
A200PMP 92Difference
Height170 mm115 mm+55 mm
Width70 mm54 mm+16 mm
Thickness8.3 mm15 mm−6.7 mm
Weight185 g60 g+125 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is A200 better than PMP 92?

  1. Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 800 mAh6.2×
  2. Main camera13 MP vs 0.08 MP162.5×
  3. Screen size6.8″ vs 1.8″3.8×
  4. 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · PMP 92: No
  5. Thickness8.3 mm vs 15 mm+81%

Why is PMP 92 better than A200?

  1. Weight185 g vs 60 g3.1×
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight185 g60 g
Thickness8.3 mm15 mm
Height170 mm115 mm
Width70 mm54 mm
Ingress protectionIP65—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5—
ColoursComet Orange, Nightly Blue, Meteor Titanium, Nebula GreenBlack
Display
Screen size6.8″1.8″
PanelIPS LCD—
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)720 px—
Resolution (height)1,600 px—
Pixel density260 ppi—
Refresh rate120 Hz—
Screen-to-body ratio92.4%—
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T7250—
Chip makerUnisoc—
Process12 nm—
CPU cores8—
CPU frequency1.8 GHz—
GPUMali-G57 MP1—
Memory
RAM4 GB—
Storage (max)128 GB—
Storage (base)64 GB—
Memory card slotYes—
Camera
Main camera13 MP0.08 MP
Rear cameras11
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video1080p—
Selfie camera5 MP—
4K selfie videoNo—
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh800 mAh
Battery type—Li-Ion
Wired charging15 W—
Wireless chargingNo—
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4—
NFCNo—
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C
USB version2—
Features
Stereo speakersNo—
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
SensorsUnspecified—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15 (Go edition)—
PlatformAndroid—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare