- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Zero Ultra vs GT Neo 3 150W
Infinix Zero Ultra vs Realme GT Neo 3 150W
What Zero Ultra does better (5) and where GT Neo 3 150W wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Display7.9
8.8Camera8.6
6.7Battery6.7
7.9Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Zero UltraGT Neo 3 150W
| Zero Ultra | GT Neo 3 150W | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.5 mm | 163.3 mm | +2.2 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 75.6 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 213 g | 188 g | +25 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Zero Ultra better than GT Neo 3 150W?
- Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
- Wired charging180 W vs 150 W+20%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.5% vs 87.5%+3%
Why is GT Neo 3 150W better than Zero Ultra?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Stereo speakersNo · Zero Ultra: Yes
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.85 GHz+14%
- Weight213 g vs 188 g+13%
- Process6 nm vs 5 nm+20%
- Charged in 30 min250% vs 300%+20%
- Thickness8.8 mm vs 8.2 mm+7%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.9+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 213 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 165.5 mm | 163.3 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 75.6 mm |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Coslight Silver, Genesis Noir | Plain Black (Asphalt Black), Silverstone White (Sprint White), Le Mans Blue (Nitro Blue), Naruto edition |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,412 px |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 900 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.5% | 87.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 920 | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.85 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 819,348 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,079 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.22" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 180 W | 150 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 250% | 300% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 12 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Poco F4 GTvsInfinix Zero Ultra
8.58.4
vs
Motorola Edge 30 ProvsInfinix Zero Ultra
8.78.4
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K50 GamingvsInfinix Zero Ultra
8.48.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022vsInfinix Zero Ultra
8.38.4
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K50vsInfinix Zero Ultra
8.68.4
vs
OnePlus Ace ProvsInfinix Zero Ultra
8.68.4


