- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Note 60 Ultra vs Galaxy S25 Ultra
Infinix Note 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
What Note 60 Ultra does better (9) and where Galaxy S25 Ultra wins (20) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display9.1
8.4Performance9.1
9.6Camera9.8
9.7Battery7.1
7.5Features9.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 60 UltraGalaxy S25 Ultra
| Note 60 Ultra | Galaxy S25 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.3 mm | 162.8 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 77.6 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 220 g | 218 g | +2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 60 Ultra better than Galaxy S25 Ultra?
- Wired charging100 W vs 45 W2.2×
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+40%
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 2,600 nits+73%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Active use (test)17.5 h vs 14.8 h+18%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 12 MP2.7×
- Wireless charging power50 W vs 15 W3.3×
- Charged in 30 min83% vs 65%+28%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 8.2 mm+4%
Why is Galaxy S25 Ultra better than Note 60 Ultra?
- Major OS updates promised3 vs 72.3×
- AnTuTu score1,708,926 vs 2,207,809+29%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,783 vs 9,846+45%
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,101 vs 6,687+63%
- Optical zoom3.5× vs 5×+43%
- CPU frequency3.25 GHz vs 4.47 GHz+38%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Measured brightness1,217 nits vs 1,417 nits+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 220 g | 218 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 162.3 mm | 162.8 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 77.6 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Titanium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Armor 2 |
| Colours | Torino Black, Monza Red, Roma Silver, Amalfi Blue | Titanium Silver Blue, Titanium Black, Titanium White Silver, Titanium Gray, Titanium Jade Green, Titanium Jet Black, Titanium Pink Gold |
| Stylus | — | Yes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,208 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,644 px | 3,120 px |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 498 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 2,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,217 nits | 1,417 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5% | 92.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.25 GHz | 4.47 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | Adreno 830 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,708,926 | 2,207,809 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,783 | 9,846 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,101 | 6,687 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.4" | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3.5× | 5× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 12 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 17.5 h | 14.8 h |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 83% | 65% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | — | Yes |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.9 LUFS | -24.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, heart rate, SpO2 | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.25 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 16 | One UI 9 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | 7 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 2,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 45 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26+vsInfinix Note 60 Ultra
9.39.5
vs
Vivo iQOO 15RvsInfinix Note 60 Ultra
9.59.5
vs
OnePlus 15TvsInfinix Note 60 Ultra
9.79.5
vs
Honor Magic8 Pro AirvsInfinix Note 60 Ultra
9.69.5
vs
OPPO Reno15 Pro MaxvsInfinix Note 60 Ultra
9.69.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
9.59.6