- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Note 60 Pro vs T909
Infinix Note 60 Pro vs Tel.Me. T909
What Note 60 Pro does better (7) and where T909 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
9.8Display3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 60 ProT909
| Note 60 Pro | T909 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 109 mm | +53.4 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 44 mm | +33.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 22 mm | −14.6 mm |
| Weight | 202 g | 95 g | +107 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 60 Pro better than T909?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 600 mAh10×
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 60 Hz2.4×
- OLED panelYes · T909: No
- Stereo speakersYes · T909: No
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 22 mm3×
- eSIMYes · T909: No
- Dual SIMYes · T909: No
Why is T909 better than Note 60 Pro?
- Weight202 g vs 95 g2.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202 g | 95 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 22 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 109 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 44 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | Mist Titanium, Deep Ocean Blue, Solar Orange, Mocha Brown, Torino Black, Frost Silver, Pininfarina Black | 3 - Silver/ Grey, Grey/Silver, Silver/Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | — |
| Panel | AMOLED | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,208 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 2,644 px | — |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,694 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 | — |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | — |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 2.7 GHz | — |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 868,860 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,412 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,219 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | — |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | — |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 16.1 h | — |
| Wired charging | 90 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 94% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.6 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, heart rate, SpO2 | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | XOS 16 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
