dotrising.com
Compare
Note 50 Pro 4G vs Spark Slim

Infinix Note 50 Pro 4G vs Tecno Spark Slim

What Note 50 Pro 4G does better (11) and where Spark Slim wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Infinix · 2025Note 50 Pro 4G

7.7Score

11 advantages≈ $190

Higher score

Tecno · 2025Spark Slim

7.5Score

6 advantages≈ $190

9.3Display9.8

4.3Performance4.6

8.2Camera5.2

7.1Battery7.8

4.4Features4.1

Dimensions

Size comparison

Note 50 Pro 4GSpark Slim

	Note 50 Pro 4G	Spark Slim	Difference
Height	163.3 mm	164.2 mm	−0.9 mm
Width	74.4 mm	75.9 mm	−1.5 mm
Thickness	7.3 mm	5.9 mm	+1.4 mm
Weight	198 g	156 g	+42 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Note 50 Pro 4G better than Spark Slim?

Wired charging90 W vs 45 W2×
RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
Optical stabilisationYes · Spark Slim: No
Wireless chargingYes · Spark Slim: No
Stereo speakersYes · Spark Slim: No
Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
Rear cameras2 vs 12×
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Spark Slim: No
Dual SIMYes · Spark Slim: No
Charged in 30 min79% vs 53%+49%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%

Why is Spark Slim better than Note 50 Pro 4G?

Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 4,500 nits3.5×
AnTuTu score437,302 vs 591,552+35%
Weight198 g vs 156 g+27%
Pixel density393 ppi vs 440 ppi+12%
Thickness7.3 mm vs 5.9 mm+24%
Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,224 px+13%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Infinix Note 50 Pro 4G≈ $1907.7	Tecno Spark Slim≈ $1907.5
Design
Weight	198 g	156 g
Thickness	7.3 mm	5.9 mm
Height	163.3 mm	164.2 mm
Width	74.4 mm	75.9 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Plastic
Back	Plastic	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP64	IP64
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx4	IPx4
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Titanium Grey, Enchanted Purple, Racing Edition, Shadow Black	Slim White, Cool Black
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.8″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,224 px
Resolution (height)	2,436 px	2,720 px
Pixel density	393 ppi	440 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	1,300 nits	4,500 nits
Measured brightness	1,054 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	90.4%	89.1%
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate	Mediatek Helio G200
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	6 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score	437,302	591,552
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	1,970	1,985
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	384	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	—
Main sensor size	1/1.57"	—
Rear cameras	2	1
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	1080p	1080p
Selfie camera	32 MP	13 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,200 mAh	5,160 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	11.4 h	—
Wired charging	90 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	79%	53%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	30 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	No	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 4
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-25.3 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, heart rate, SpO2	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	XOS 15	HIOS 15
Major OS updates promised	2	—