- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Note 30 Pro vs Tiger 12
Infinix Note 30 Pro vs OSCAL Tiger 12
What Note 30 Pro does better (10) and where Tiger 12 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display6.3
6.7Camera5.7
7.6Battery6.0
4.1Features6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 30 ProTiger 12
| Note 30 Pro | Tiger 12 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.7 mm | 168.5 mm | −5.8 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 76.6 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 203 g | 198 g | +5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 30 Pro better than Tiger 12?
- Wired charging68 W vs 33 W2.1×
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- OLED panelYes · Tiger 12: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Tiger 12: No
- Peak brightness900 nits vs 500 nits+80%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.9% vs 84.6%+3%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 8.4 mm+2%
Why is Tiger 12 better than Note 30 Pro?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Weight203 g vs 198 g+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 162.7 mm | 168.5 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 76.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Colours | Magic Black, Variable Gold | Cerulean Blue, Flowing Purple, Cloudwing Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 900 nits | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.9% | 84.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 562,269 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,975 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 347 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 80% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Rear |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 13 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 48 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | C |
Related comparisons
vs
Infinix Note 40 ProvsInfinix Note 30 Pro
8.37.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A25vsInfinix Note 30 Pro
7.27.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsInfinix Note 30 Pro
6.87.0
vs
Xiaomi Poco X5vsInfinix Note 30 Pro
6.97.0
vs
OnePlus Nord CE 3 LitevsInfinix Note 30 Pro
7.17.0
vs
Tecno Pova 5 ProvsInfinix Note 30 Pro
7.07.0