- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Hot 50 Pro 4G vs Blue 20
Infinix Hot 50 Pro 4G vs Meizu Blue 20
What Hot 50 Pro 4G does better (6) and where Blue 20 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Display5.4
4.6Camera3.8
4.2Features8.1
Why is Hot 50 Pro 4G better than Blue 20?
- Main camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
- OLED panelYes · Blue 20: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.5″+4%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 5 MP+60%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5+8%
Why is Blue 20 better than Hot 50 Pro 4G?
- 5GNo · Hot 50 Pro 4G: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+5%
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 404 ppi+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | — |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | — |
| Height | 167 mm | — |
| Width | 76.4 mm | — |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Sleek Black, Titanium Grey, Glacier Blue | Black, White, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 404 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.1% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 | Unisoc T765 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 562,039 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,992 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.8" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,010 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 56% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Flyme AIOS |
| Platform | Android | Other |
| Interface | XOS 14.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 1 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13vsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G
6.76.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A16 5GvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G
6.86.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A16vsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G
6.66.7
vs
Infinix Hot 60 ProvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G
7.66.7
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G
6.86.7
vs
Infinix Hot 50 Pro 4GvsInfinix Hot 40 Pro
6.76.6