- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Hot 12 Play NFC vs iQOO U5
Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC vs Vivo iQOO U5
What Hot 12 Play NFC does better (3) and where iQOO U5 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.4Display6.7
3.4Camera4.6
6.2Battery4.6
6.4Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 12 Play NFCiQOO U5
| Hot 12 Play NFC | iQOO U5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171 mm | 164 mm | +7 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 75.8 mm | +2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.3 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 209 g | 185 g | +24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 12 Play NFC better than iQOO U5?
- NFCYes · iQOO U5: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+4%
Why is iQOO U5 better than Hot 12 Play NFC?
- Main camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.8×
- Wired charging10 W vs 18 W+80%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Pixel density263 ppi vs 401 ppi+52%
- CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+22%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Weight209 g vs 185 g+13%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 8.3 mm+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 209 g | 185 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 171 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Racing Black, Horizon Blue, Daylight Green, Champagne Gold | White, Gray, Aurora |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,640 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 263 ppi | 401 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.8% | 83.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T610 | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MP2 | Adreno 619 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/3.1" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 10 | OriginOS Ocean |
Related comparisons
vs
Realme 10vsInfinix Hot 12 Play NFC
6.36.3
vs
Xiaomi Poco M4 ProvsInfinix Hot 12 Play NFC
6.36.3
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11SvsInfinix Hot 12 Play NFC
6.36.3
vs
Infinix Hot 30 Play NFCvsInfinix Hot 12 Play NFC
5.36.3
vs
Xiaomi Poco M5svsInfinix Hot 12 Play NFC
6.26.3
vs
Realme Narzo 50vsInfinix Hot 12 Play NFC
6.26.3


