- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Hot 12 Play NFC vs Pova Neo 2
Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC vs Tecno Pova Neo 2
What Hot 12 Play NFC does better (2) and where Pova Neo 2 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.4Display5.4
3.4Camera3.7
6.2Battery7.6
6.4Features4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 12 Play NFCPova Neo 2
| Hot 12 Play NFC | Pova Neo 2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171 mm | 170.9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 77.8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 9.6 mm | −0.7 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 12 Play NFC better than Pova Neo 2?
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 9.6 mm+8%
Why is Pova Neo 2 better than Hot 12 Play NFC?
- Wired charging10 W vs 18 W+80%
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+17%
- Main camera13 MP vs 16 MP+23%
- CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 209 g | — |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 9.6 mm |
| Height | 171 mm | 170.9 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 77.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Racing Black, Horizon Blue, Daylight Green, Champagne Gold | Uranolite Gray, Virtual Blue, Orange Magma |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,640 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 263 ppi | 263 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.8% | 83.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T610 | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/3.1" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 10 | HiOS |
Related comparisons
vs
Realme 10vsInfinix Hot 12 Play NFC
6.36.3
vs
Xiaomi Poco M4 ProvsInfinix Hot 12 Play NFC
6.36.3
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11SvsInfinix Hot 12 Play NFC
6.36.3
vs
Infinix Hot 30 Play NFCvsInfinix Hot 12 Play NFC
5.36.3
vs
Xiaomi Poco M5svsInfinix Hot 12 Play NFC
6.26.3
vs
Realme Narzo 50vsInfinix Hot 12 Play NFC
6.26.3