- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Hot 12 Play NFC vs Reno7 Lite
Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC vs OPPO Reno7 Lite
What Hot 12 Play NFC does better (3) and where Reno7 Lite wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.4Display5.7
3.4Camera6.1
6.2Battery4.2
6.4Features6.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 12 Play NFCReno7 Lite
| Hot 12 Play NFC | Reno7 Lite | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171 mm | 159.9 mm | +11.1 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 73.2 mm | +4.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.5 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Weight | 209 g | 173 g | +36 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 12 Play NFC better than Reno7 Lite?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+33%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.4″+6%
Why is Reno7 Lite better than Hot 12 Play NFC?
- Main camera13 MP vs 64 MP4.9×
- Wired charging10 W vs 33 W3.3×
- OLED panelNo · Hot 12 Play NFC: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Pixel density263 ppi vs 409 ppi+56%
- CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+22%
- Weight209 g vs 173 g+21%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 209 g | 173 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 171 mm | 159.9 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 73.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Racing Black, Horizon Blue, Daylight Green, Champagne Gold | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,640 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 263 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 657 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.8% | 85.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T610 | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MP2 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 315,250 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,996 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/3.1" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 10 | ColorOS 12 |
Related comparisons
vs
Realme 10vsInfinix Hot 12 Play NFC
6.36.3
vs
Xiaomi Poco M4 ProvsInfinix Hot 12 Play NFC
6.36.3
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11SvsInfinix Hot 12 Play NFC
6.36.3
vs
Infinix Hot 30 Play NFCvsInfinix Hot 12 Play NFC
5.36.3
vs
Xiaomi Poco M5svsInfinix Hot 12 Play NFC
6.26.3
vs
Realme Narzo 50vsInfinix Hot 12 Play NFC
6.26.3


