- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Pura 90 vs X200T
Huawei Pura 90 vs Vivo X200T
What Pura 90 does better (10) and where X200T wins (8) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pura 90X200T
| Pura 90 | X200T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.1 mm | 160 mm | +3.1 mm |
| Width | 78.1 mm | 74.3 mm | +3.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 8 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 210 g | 203 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pura 90 better than X200T?
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 6,200 mAh+5%
- Wired charging100 W vs 90 W+11%
- Optical zoom3.7× vs 3×+23%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Wireless charging power50 W vs 40 W+25%
- Thickness7 mm vs 8 mm+14%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%
- Resolution (width)1,320 px vs 1,260 px+5%
Why is X200T better than Pura 90?
- AnTuTu score1,248,520 vs 2,725,9892.2×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,987 vs 8,4302.1×
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+45%
- Process7 nm vs 3 nm2.3×
- eSIMNo · Pura 90: Yes
- Weight210 g vs 203 g+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
- Charged in 30 min67% vs 70%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 210 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 163.1 mm | 160 mm |
| Width | 78.1 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Kunlun Glass | Schott Xensation Core |
| Colours | Black, White Dark Purple | Seaside Lilac, Stellar Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,320 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,856 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 463 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 5,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 90.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 9010s | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ |
| Chip maker | Kirin | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 3.63 GHz |
| GPU | Maleoon 910 | Immortalis-G925 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,248,520 | 2,725,989 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,987 | 8,430 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3.7× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 6,200 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 67% | 70% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | 40 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.09 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 6.1 | Android 16 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | OriginOS 6 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 5 |
