- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Pocket S vs Razr 2022
Huawei Pocket S vs Motorola Razr 2022
What Pocket S does better (10) and where Razr 2022 wins (13) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pocket SRazr 2022
| Pocket S | Razr 2022 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 170 mm | 167 mm | +3 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 79.8 mm | −4.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.6 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 200 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pocket S better than Razr 2022?
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 3,500 mAh+14%
- Wired charging40 W vs 30 W+33%
- Memory card slotYes · Razr 2022: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · Razr 2022: No
- Pixel density442 ppi vs 393 ppi+12%
- Weight190 g vs 200 g+5%
- Screen size6.9″ vs 6.7″+3%
- Resolution (width)1,188 px vs 1,080 px+10%
- Thickness7.2 mm vs 7.6 mm+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio85.1% vs 81.3%+5%
Why is Razr 2022 better than Pocket S?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationNo · Pocket S: Yes
- 5GNo · Pocket S: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Pocket S: Yes
- Main camera40 MP vs 50 MP+25%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Selfie camera11 MP vs 32 MP3×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.19 GHz+33%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- eSIMNo · Pocket S: Yes
- USB version2 vs 3.1+55%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 170 mm | 167 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 79.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Colours | Blue, Pink, Gren, Silver, Gold, Black | Satin Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Foldable OLED | Foldable AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,188 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,790 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 442 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,033 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1% | 81.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 4G | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.19 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 965,260 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,944 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 40 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 11 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 3,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 78% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 3.0 | Android 13 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z FlipvsHuawei Pocket S
4.44.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5GvsHuawei Pocket S
5.44.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5GvsHuawei Pocket S
4.74.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4vsMotorola Razr 2022
6.15.9
vs
Motorola Razr 40vsMotorola Razr 2022
4.75.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GvsMotorola Razr 2022
5.55.9

