- dotrising.com
- Compare
- P50 Pocket vs X Fold3
Huawei P50 Pocket vs Vivo X Fold3
What P50 Pocket does better (4) and where X Fold3 wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.3Display9.4
3.4Camera7.4
3.4Battery8.8
3.2Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
P50 PocketX Fold3
| P50 Pocket | X Fold3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 170 mm | 160 mm | +10 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 142.7 mm | −67.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 4.7 mm | +2.5 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 219 g | −29 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is P50 Pocket better than X Fold3?
- Memory card slotYes · X Fold3: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · X Fold3: No
- Weight190 g vs 219 g+15%
- Pixel density442 ppi vs 413 ppi+7%
Why is X Fold3 better than P50 Pocket?
- Wired charging40 W vs 80 W2×
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+38%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · P50 Pocket: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · P50 Pocket: Yes
- 5GNo · P50 Pocket: Yes
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Main camera40 MP vs 50 MP+25%
- Selfie camera11 MP vs 32 MP3×
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Screen size6.9″ vs 8″+16%
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 219 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 4.7 mm |
| Height | 170 mm | 160 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 142.7 mm |
| Colours | Black, Gold, Silver | Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 8″ |
| Panel | Foldable OLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,188 px | 2,200 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,790 px | 2,480 px |
| Pixel density | 442 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 803 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1% | 90.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 4G | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | 768,513 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,077 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 40 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 11 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 80 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -30.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 2.0 (China) | Android 14 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | EMUI 12 (Europe) | OriginOS 4 |
