- dotrising.com
- Compare
- P50 Pocket vs Pocket S
Huawei P50 Pocket vs Huawei Pocket S
What P50 Pocket does better (6) and where Pocket S wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display8.2
3.4Camera3.3
3.3Battery3.3
3.2Features2.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
P50 PocketPocket S
| P50 Pocket | Pocket S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 170 mm | 170 mm | = |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 75.5 mm | = |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.2 mm | = |
| Weight | 190 g | 190 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is P50 Pocket better than Pocket S?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Stereo speakersYes · Pocket S: No
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+18%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Process5 nm vs 6 nm+20%
Why is Pocket S better than P50 Pocket?
Pocket S has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.2 mm |
| Height | 170 mm | 170 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Colours | Black, Gold, Silver | Blue, Pink, Gren, Silver, Gold, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable OLED | Foldable OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,188 px | 1,188 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,790 px | 2,790 px |
| Pixel density | 442 ppi | 442 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Measured brightness | 803 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1% | 85.1% |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 4G | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 4G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | 768,513 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,077 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 40 MP | 40 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 11 MP | 11 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 40 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 78% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -30.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 2.0 (China) | HarmonyOS 3.0 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | HarmonyOS |
| Interface | EMUI 12 (Europe) | — |
Related comparisons
vs
OPPO Find NvsHuawei P50 Pocket
5.44.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z FlipvsHuawei P50 Pocket
4.44.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5GvsHuawei P50 Pocket
5.44.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5GvsHuawei P50 Pocket
4.74.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z FlipvsHuawei Pocket S
4.44.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5GvsHuawei Pocket S
5.44.6