- dotrising.com
- Compare
- nova Flip vs Razr Ultra 2026
Huawei nova Flip vs Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
What nova Flip does better (3) and where Razr Ultra 2026 wins (20) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.8Display9.7
2.4Performance9.5
6.2Camera8.8
5.6Battery8.6
4.7Features8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
nova FlipRazr Ultra 2026
| nova Flip | Razr Ultra 2026 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 169.8 mm | 171.5 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 74 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm | 7.2 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 199 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is nova Flip better than Razr Ultra 2026?
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Weight195 g vs 199 g+2%
- Thickness6.9 mm vs 7.2 mm+4%
Why is Razr Ultra 2026 better than nova Flip?
- AnTuTu score698,341 vs 3,379,5914.8×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,509 vs 8,8893.5×
- Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 5,000 nits4.2×
- Wireless chargingNo · nova Flip: Yes
- Battery capacity4,400 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+14%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 4.47 GHz+86%
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Process7 nm vs 3 nm2.3×
- Wired charging66 W vs 68 W+3%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Max video4K vs 8K
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm | 7.2 mm |
| Height | 169.8 mm | 171.5 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP48 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass Ceramic |
| Colours | Green, Pink, White, Black | Pantone: Orient Blue, Cocoa |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 7″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO OLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,136 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,690 px | 2,992 px |
| Pixel density | 421 ppi | 462 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 5,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,424 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87% | 87.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 8000 | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 4.47 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 | Adreno 830 |
| AnTuTu score | 698,341 | 3,379,591 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,509 | 8,889 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,400 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 68 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 75% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 4.2 | Android 16 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
