- dotrising.com
- Compare
- nova Flip S vs Razr+ 2024
Huawei nova Flip S vs Motorola Razr+ 2024
What nova Flip S does better (7) and where Razr+ 2024 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display9.1
6.0Camera5.7
5.6Battery4.8
4.7Features8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
nova Flip SRazr+ 2024
| nova Flip S | Razr+ 2024 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 169.8 mm | 171.4 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 74 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm | 7.1 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 189 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is nova Flip S better than Razr+ 2024?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Wired charging66 W vs 45 W+47%
- Battery capacity4,400 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+10%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Razr+ 2024: No
- Resolution (width)1,136 px vs 1,080 px+5%
- Thickness6.9 mm vs 7.1 mm+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio87% vs 84.9%+2%
Why is Razr+ 2024 better than nova Flip S?
- Telephoto cameraNo · nova Flip S: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · nova Flip S: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
- eSIMNo · nova Flip S: Yes
- Weight195 g vs 189 g+3%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
- Charged in 30 min75% vs 78%+4%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm | 7.1 mm |
| Height | 169.8 mm | 171.4 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Silicone polymer |
| Ingress protection | — | IPX8 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Green, Pink, White, Black, Nova Black, Blue | Midnight Blue, Hot Pink, Spring Green, Peach Fuzz, Paris Hilton Edition |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO OLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,136 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,690 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 421 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 3,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,253 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87% | 84.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 8030 | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 3 GHz |
| GPU | — | Adreno 735 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,158,987 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 5,601 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,400 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 75% | 78% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 5.1 | Android 14 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | Hello UI |
