- dotrising.com
- Compare
- nova 12 vs iQOO Neo9S Pro+
Huawei nova 12 vs Vivo iQOO Neo9S Pro+
What nova 12 does better (3) and where iQOO Neo9S Pro+ wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Display9.2
5.4Performance8.8
7.4Camera8.9
6.7Battery9.0
7.9Features7.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
nova 12iQOO Neo9S Pro+
| nova 12 | iQOO Neo9S Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.5 mm | 163.5 mm | −2 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 75.7 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 8 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 191 g | 193 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is nova 12 better than iQOO Neo9S Pro+?
- Selfie camera60 MP vs 16 MP3.8×
- 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Neo9S Pro+: No
- Thickness7 mm vs 8 mm+14%
Why is iQOO Neo9S Pro+ better than nova 12?
- AnTuTu score676,832 vs 2,342,4333.5×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,988 vs 6,3342.1×
- RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · nova 12: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · nova 12: Yes
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+20%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Wired charging100 W vs 120 W+20%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+38%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 191 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 161.5 mm | 163.5 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 75.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Black, Blue, White | Blue/White, Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,084 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.9% | 89.7% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 830 | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | — | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | 676,832 | 2,342,433 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,988 | 6,334 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,939 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 60 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 124% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 4.0 | Android 14 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | HarmonyOS 4.0 | OriginOS 6 |
