- dotrising.com
- Compare
- nova 12 Ultra vs Reno11 F
Huawei nova 12 Ultra vs OPPO Reno11 F
What nova 12 Ultra does better (11) and where Reno11 F wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display7.7
7.2Performance5.7
6.4Camera7.5
6.7Battery7.2
8.7Features7.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
nova 12 UltraReno11 F
| nova 12 Ultra | Reno11 F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.1 mm | 161.1 mm | +2 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 74.7 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 177 g | +21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is nova 12 Ultra better than Reno11 F?
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,115 vs 2,398+72%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- AnTuTu score1,030,315 vs 841,497+22%
- Wired charging100 W vs 67 W+49%
- Stereo speakersYes · Reno11 F: No
- Charged in 30 min180% vs 62%2.9×
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Pixel density449 ppi vs 394 ppi+14%
- Main camera aperturef/1.4 vs f/1.7+21%
- Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,080 px+13%
Why is Reno11 F better than nova 12 Ultra?
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+9%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Memory card slotNo · nova 12 Ultra: Yes
- Weight198 g vs 177 g+12%
- Process7 nm vs 6 nm+17%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 7.5 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 177 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 163.1 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Kunlun Glass | Panda glass |
| Colours | Black, Blue, White | Palm Green, Ocean Blue, Coral Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,776 px | 2,412 px |
| Pixel density | 449 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,100 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89% | 89.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 9000S | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.62 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Maleoon 910 MP4 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,030,315 | 841,497 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,115 | 2,398 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.4 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.31" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 180% | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 4.0 | Android 14 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | HarmonyOS 4.0 | ColorOS 15 |
