- dotrising.com
- Compare
- nova 10 vs Galaxy A73 5G
Huawei nova 10 vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
What nova 10 does better (6) and where Galaxy A73 5G wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Display7.5
7.4Camera8.8
4.3Battery5.3
8.7Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
nova 10Galaxy A73 5G
| nova 10 | Galaxy A73 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.2 mm | 163.7 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 76.1 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm | 7.6 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 168 g | 181 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is nova 10 better than Galaxy A73 5G?
- Wired charging66 W vs 25 W2.6×
- Selfie camera60 MP vs 32 MP+88%
- Weight168 g vs 181 g+8%
- Thickness6.9 mm vs 7.6 mm+10%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.6% vs 87%+3%
Why is Galaxy A73 5G better than nova 10?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+25%
- Optical stabilisationNo · nova 10: Yes
- Memory card slotNo · nova 10: Yes
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 168 g | 181 g |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 162.2 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Silver, Green, Violet | Gray, Mint, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | 87% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 4G | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | — | 737,242 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,829 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 686 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 60 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 45% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.28 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 2.0 (China) | Android 12 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | EMUI 12 (Europe) | One UI 6.1 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
