How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. Mate XT 2 Ultimate vs Razr Fold

Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate vs Motorola Razr Fold

What Mate XT 2 Ultimate does better (4) and where Razr Fold wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate
Huawei · 2026Mate XT 2 Ultimate
8.3Score
4 advantages≈ $2,800
vs
Motorola Razr Fold
Motorola · 2026Razr Fold
9.7Score
9 advantages≈ $2,250
Higher score
4.6Display9.5
7.7Camera9.1
9.0Battery9.7
7.4Features9.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Mate XT 2 UltimateRazr Fold
219.2 × 157.23.5144.5 × 160.14.7
Mate XT 2 UltimateRazr FoldDifference
Height157.2 mm160.1 mm−2.9 mm
Width219.2 mm144.5 mm+74.7 mm
Thickness3.5 mm4.7 mm−1.2 mm
Weight299 g243 g+56 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Mate XT 2 Ultimate better than Razr Fold?

  1. Screen size10.2″ vs 8.1″+26%
  2. Optical zoom3.5× vs 3×+17%
  3. Thickness3.5 mm vs 4.7 mm+34%
  4. Main camera aperturef/1.5 vs f/1.6+7%

Why is Razr Fold better than Mate XT 2 Ultimate?

  1. Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
  2. Battery capacity5,600 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+7%
  3. Wired charging66 W vs 80 W+21%
  4. Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
  5. Weight299 g vs 243 g+23%
  6. Max video4K vs 8K
  7. eSIMNo · Mate XT 2 Ultimate: Yes
  8. Pixel density381 ppi vs 410 ppi+8%
  9. USB version3.1 vs 3.2+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Motorola Razr FoldMotorola Razr Fold≈ $2,2509.7
Design
Weight299 g243 g
Thickness3.5 mm4.7 mm
Height157.2 mm160.1 mm
Width219.2 mm144.5 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Silicone polymer
Ingress protectionIP58IP48
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Gorilla Glass-Keramik
ColoursBlack, Black/Purple, WhitePantone: Blackened Blue, Lily White
StylusYesYes
Display
Screen size10.2″8.1″
PanelTri-foldable LTPO OLEDFoldable LTPO P-OLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)2,232 px2,232 px
Resolution (height)3,184 px2,484 px
Pixel density381 ppi410 ppi
Refresh rate90 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—6,200 nits
Measured brightness—1,510 nits
Screen-to-body ratio91.6%91.9%
HDR—Yes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetKirin 9050 ProQualcomm SM8845 Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Chip makerKirinQualcomm
Process—3 nm
CPU cores—8
CPU frequency—3.8 GHz
GPU—Adreno 829
AnTuTu score—2,342,132
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—8,804
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—5,152
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage type—UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.5f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.28"1/1.28"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3.5×3×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera8 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,600 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—16.1 h
Wired charging66 W80 W
Charged in 30 min—50%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power50 W50 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth66
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.1USB Type-C 3.2
USB version3.13.2
Video outputYesYes
Satellite messagingYes—
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-28.5 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, altimeterFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launchHarmonyOS 7.0Android 16
PlatformHarmonyOSAndroid
Major OS updates promised—7
EU label
Energy class—A
Battery charge cycles—1,200
Endurance per cycle—59 h
Repairability class—B
Drop resistance class—C
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare