- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Mate X7 vs X Fold+
Huawei Mate X7 vs Vivo X Fold+
What Mate X7 does better (13) and where X Fold+ wins (8) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mate X7X Fold+
| Mate X7 | X Fold+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 156.8 mm | 162 mm | −5.2 mm |
| Width | 144.2 mm | 144.9 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 4.5 mm | 6.3 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Weight | 236 g | 311 g | −75 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mate X7 better than X Fold+?
- RAM20 GB vs 12 GB+67%
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Battery capacity5,600 mAh vs 4,730 mAh+18%
- Weight236 g vs 311 g+32%
- 4K selfie videoYes · X Fold+: No
- eSIMYes · X Fold+: No
- Dual SIMYes · X Fold+: No
- Pixel density412 ppi vs 360 ppi+14%
- Thickness4.5 mm vs 6.3 mm+40%
- Main camera aperturef/1.5 vs f/1.8+20%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.2+15%
Why is X Fold+ better than Mate X7?
- Wired charging66 W vs 80 W+21%
- Optical zoom3.5× vs 5×+43%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- CPU frequency2.75 GHz vs 3.19 GHz+16%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Rear cameras3 vs 4+33%
- USB version3.1 vs 3.2+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 236 g | 311 g |
| Thickness | 4.5 mm | 6.3 mm |
| Height | 156.8 mm | 162 mm |
| Width | 144.2 mm | 144.9 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Silicone polymer | — |
| Ingress protection | IP58 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Black, Brocade White, Nebula Red, Purple, Blue | Black, Blue, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8″ | 8″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO OLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 2,210 px | 1,916 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,416 px | 2,160 px |
| Pixel density | 412 ppi | 360 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,500 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | 88% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 9030 Pro | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.75 GHz | 3.19 GHz |
| GPU | Maleoon 935 | Adreno 730 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 20 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4. | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.28" | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3.5× | 5× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,600 mAh | 4,730 mAh |
| Active use (test) | 11.8 h | — |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 86% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | 50 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | EMUI 15 (International) | Android 12 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | OriginOS Ocean |
