- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Mate 90 vs Reno16 Pro 5G
Huawei Mate 90 vs OPPO Reno16 Pro 5G
What Mate 90 does better (10) and where Reno16 Pro 5G wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.5Display9.2
9.5Camera9.6
9.5Battery8.9
9.7Features9.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mate 90Reno16 Pro 5G
| Mate 90 | Reno16 Pro 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.9 mm | 151.2 mm | +10.7 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 72.4 mm | +3.3 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mate 90 better than Reno16 Pro 5G?
- Wireless chargingYes · Reno16 Pro 5G: No
- Battery capacity6,600 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+10%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Optical zoom4× vs 3.5×+14%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.3″+7%
- Main camera aperturef/1.4 vs f/1.8+29%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
- CPU cores9 vs 8+12%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%
- Resolution (width)1,280 px vs 1,216 px+5%
Why is Reno16 Pro 5G better than Mate 90?
- Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
- Wired charging66 W vs 80 W+21%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.8×
- CPU frequency2.69 GHz vs 3.4 GHz+26%
- Screen-to-body ratio90% vs 93.4%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 217 g | — |
| Thickness | 8 mm | — |
| Height | 161.9 mm | 151.2 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 72.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Huawei Kunlun Glass 3 | OnePlus Crystal Guard |
| Colours | Black, White, Green, Pink | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.3″ |
| Panel | LTPO OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,280 px | 1,216 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,832 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 93.4% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 9030 | Mediatek Dimensity 8550 Super |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Mediatek |
| CPU cores | 9 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.69 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| GPU | Maleoon 935A | Mali G720 MC8 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,582,664 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,292 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | — |
| Memory card slot | No | — |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.4 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.28" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 4× | 3.5× |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,600 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 80 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | — |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes | — |
| 3D face unlock | Yes | — |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Face ID, fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, altimeter | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 7.0 | Android 16 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | ColorOS 16 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 62 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
