- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Mate 90 Pro vs Galaxy S26 Ultra
Huawei Mate 90 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
What Mate 90 Pro does better (5) and where Galaxy S26 Ultra wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Display9.2
8.4Performance9.4
9.5Camera9.8
9.7Battery8.0
9.7Features9.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mate 90 ProGalaxy S26 Ultra
| Mate 90 Pro | Galaxy S26 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.9 mm | 163.6 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 78.1 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 222 g | 214 g | +8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mate 90 Pro better than Galaxy S26 Ultra?
- Wired charging100 W vs 60 W+67%
- Battery capacity6,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+32%
- Wireless charging power50 W vs 25 W2×
- CPU cores9 vs 8+12%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 12 MP+8%
Why is Galaxy S26 Ultra better than Mate 90 Pro?
- Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,510 vs 11,5662.1×
- AnTuTu score1,811,490 vs 2,627,986+45%
- CPU frequency2.85 GHz vs 4.74 GHz+66%
- Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 2,600 nits+30%
- Optical zoom4× vs 5×+25%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Pixel density449 ppi vs 500 ppi+11%
- Weight222 g vs 214 g+4%
- Process5 nm vs 3 nm+67%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.9″+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 222 g | 214 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 161.9 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 78.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Huawei Kunlun Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Armor 2 |
| Colours | White, Green, Black, Orange | Cobalt Violet, Sky Blue, Black, White, Silver Shadow, Pink Gold |
| Stylus | — | Yes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Dual-layer LTPO OLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,832 px | 3,120 px |
| Pixel density | 449 ppi | 500 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits | 2,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,480 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 79.9% | 90.7% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 9035 | Qualcomm SM8850-1-AD Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 9 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.85 GHz | 4.74 GHz |
| GPU | Maleoon 935 | Adreno 840 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,811,490 | 2,627,986 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,510 | 11,566 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 7,744 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4. |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.4 | f/1.4 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.28" | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 4× | 5× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 12 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,600 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 16.4 h |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 60 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 75% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | 25 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 6 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Video output | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | — | Yes |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes | Under display, ultrasonic |
| 3D face unlock | Yes | — |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Face ID, fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, altimeter | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.28 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 7.0 | Android 16 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 9 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 7 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 55 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
9.59.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
9.69.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26 UltravsMotorola Signature
9.69.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26 UltravsRealme 16 Pro+
9.69.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26 UltravsOnePlus Nord 6
9.69.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26 UltravsOnePlus 15T
9.69.7


