How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. Mate 80 Pro vs X200 Ultra

Huawei Mate 80 Pro vs Vivo X200 Ultra

What Mate 80 Pro does better (11) and where X200 Ultra wins (13) — every spec side by side.

Huawei Mate 80 Pro
Huawei · 2025Mate 80 Pro
9.4Score
11 advantages≈ $970
vs
Vivo X200 Ultra
Vivo · 2025X200 Ultra
9.6Score
13 advantages≈ $840
Higher score
8.9Display9.3
8.1Performance9.3
9.5Camera9.7
8.9Battery8.4
9.3Features9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Mate 80 ProX200 Ultra
76 × 161.9876.8 × 163.18.7
Mate 80 ProX200 UltraDifference
Height161.9 mm163.1 mm−1.2 mm
Width76 mm76.8 mm−0.8 mm
Thickness8 mm8.7 mm−0.7 mm
Weight219 g229 g−10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Mate 80 Pro better than X200 Ultra?

  1. Wired charging100 W vs 90 W+11%
  2. Active use (test)14 h vs 13.6 h+3%
  3. Wireless charging power80 W vs 40 W2×
  4. Optical zoom4× vs 3.7×+8%
  5. Weight219 g vs 229 g+5%
  6. Charged in 30 min100% vs 64%+56%
  7. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  8. Main camera aperturef/1.4 vs f/1.7+21%
  9. CPU cores9 vs 8+12%
  10. Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%
  11. Thickness8 mm vs 8.7 mm+9%

Why is X200 Ultra better than Mate 80 Pro?

  1. AnTuTu score1,725,229 vs 2,914,061+69%
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,169 vs 9,410+82%
  3. Battery capacity5,750 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+4%
  4. CPU frequency2.75 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+57%
  5. Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 4,500 nits+50%
  6. Selfie camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.8×
  7. Process6 nm vs 3 nm2×
  8. Max video4K vs 8K
  9. 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
  10. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx9+12%
  11. Pixel density460 ppi vs 510 ppi+11%
  12. Resolution (width)1,280 px vs 1,440 px+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X200 UltraVivo X200 Ultra≈ $8409.6
Design
Weight219 g229 g
Thickness8 mm8.7 mm
Height161.9 mm163.1 mm
Width76 mm76.8 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackPlasticGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP69
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx9
Glass protectionHuawei Kunlun Glass 2Armor glass
ColoursBlack, White, Green, GoldBlack, Silver, Red
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelLTPO OLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,280 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)2,832 px3,168 px
Pixel density460 ppi510 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits4,500 nits
Measured brightness—1,816 nits
Screen-to-body ratio89.7%90.2%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetKirin 9030 ProQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip makerKirinQualcomm
Process6 nm3 nm
CPU cores98
CPU frequency2.75 GHz4.32 GHz
GPUMaleoon 935Adreno 830
AnTuTu score1,725,2292,914,061
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,1699,410
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—6,816
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.4f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.28"1/1.28"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom4×3.7×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps120 fps
Selfie camera13 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,750 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)14 h13.6 h
Wired charging100 W90 W
Charged in 30 min100%64%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power80 W40 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth65.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.1USB Type-C 3.2
USB version3.13.2
Video outputYesYes
Satellite messagingYesYes
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-24.4 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorYesUnder display, ultrasonic
3D face unlockYes—
BarometerYes—
SensorsFace ID, fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchEMUI 15 (International)Android 15
PlatformHarmonyOSAndroid
InterfaceEMUI 15OriginOS 5
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare