How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. Mate 50E vs Poco F4 GT

Huawei Mate 50E vs Xiaomi Poco F4 GT

What Mate 50E does better (10) and where Poco F4 GT wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Huawei Mate 50E
Huawei · 2022Mate 50E
8.0Score
10 advantages≈ $630
vs
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Xiaomi · 2022Poco F4 GT
8.5Score
9 advantages≈ $620
Higher score
7.8Display7.4
8.5Camera8.0
5.2Battery6.8
7.4Features8.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Mate 50EPoco F4 GT
76.1 × 161.5876.7 × 162.58.5
Mate 50EPoco F4 GTDifference
Height161.5 mm162.5 mm−1 mm
Width76.1 mm76.7 mm−0.6 mm
Thickness8 mm8.5 mm−0.5 mm
Weight201 g210 g−9 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Mate 50E better than Poco F4 GT?

  1. Optical stabilisationYes · Poco F4 GT: No
  2. Memory card slotYes · Poco F4 GT: No
  3. 4K selfie videoYes · Poco F4 GT: No
  4. Pixel density442 ppi vs 395 ppi+12%
  5. Weight201 g vs 210 g+4%
  6. USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
  7. Main camera aperturef/1.4 vs f/1.9+36%
  8. Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,080 px+13%
  9. Thickness8 mm vs 8.5 mm+6%
  10. Screen-to-body ratio88.6% vs 86.2%+3%

Why is Poco F4 GT better than Mate 50E?

  1. Wired charging66 W vs 120 W+82%
  2. RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
  3. 5GNo · Mate 50E: Yes
  4. Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
  5. Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
  6. Battery capacity4,460 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+5%
  7. CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3 GHz+25%
  8. Selfie camera13 MP vs 20 MP+54%
  9. Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Huawei Mate 50EHuawei Mate 50E≈ $6308.0
Design
Weight201 g210 g
Thickness8 mm8.5 mm
Height161.5 mm162.5 mm
Width76.1 mm76.7 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protectionIP68—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
ColoursBlack, Silver, PurpleStealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow
Display
Screen size6.7″6.7″
PanelOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,224 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,700 px2,400 px
Pixel density442 ppi395 ppi
Refresh rate90 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—800 nits
Measured brightness—758 nits
Screen-to-body ratio88.6%86.2%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5GQualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process6 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.4 GHz3 GHz
GPUAdreno 642LAdreno 730
AnTuTu score—952,124
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—3,637
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—2,471
Memory
RAM8 GB12 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP64 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.4f/1.9
Main sensor size—1/1.73"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesNo
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera13 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity4,460 mAh4,700 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Wired charging66 W120 W
Charged in 30 min—176%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.25.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.1USB Type-C 2.0
USB version3.12
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-27.4 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displaySide
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)—0.59 W/kg
Software
OS at launchHarmonyOS 3.0Android 12
PlatformHarmonyOSAndroid
Interface—HyperOS 2
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare