- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Mate 50E vs Galaxy A73 5G
Huawei Mate 50E vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
What Mate 50E does better (8) and where Galaxy A73 5G wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display7.5
8.5Camera8.8
5.2Battery5.3
7.4Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mate 50EGalaxy A73 5G
| Mate 50E | Galaxy A73 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.5 mm | 163.7 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 76.1 mm | = |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.6 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 201 g | 181 g | +20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mate 50E better than Galaxy A73 5G?
- Wired charging66 W vs 25 W2.6×
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
- Pixel density442 ppi vs 393 ppi+12%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Main camera aperturef/1.4 vs f/1.8+29%
- Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,080 px+13%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
Why is Galaxy A73 5G better than Mate 50E?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- 5GNo · Mate 50E: Yes
- Battery capacity4,460 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+12%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Weight201 g vs 181 g+11%
- Thickness8 mm vs 7.6 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 201 g | 181 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 161.5 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Silver, Purple | Gray, Mint, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 442 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.6% | 87% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | — | 737,242 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,829 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 686 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.4 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,460 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 45% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.28 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 3.0 | Android 12 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 6.1 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A56vsSamsung Galaxy A73 5G
8.58.0
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13vsSamsung Galaxy A73 5G
6.78.0
vs
Apple iPhone 15vsSamsung Galaxy A73 5G
7.98.0
vs
Google Pixel 7 ProvsSamsung Galaxy A73 5G
8.98.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A34vsSamsung Galaxy A73 5G
7.58.0
vs
Apple iPhone 14vsSamsung Galaxy A73 5G
7.78.0