- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Mate 50E vs Reno9
Huawei Mate 50E vs OPPO Reno9
What Mate 50E does better (11) and where Reno9 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mate 50EReno9
| Mate 50E | Reno9 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.5 mm | 162.3 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 74.2 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.2 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 201 g | 174 g | +27 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mate 50E better than Reno9?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Reno9: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Reno9: No
- Memory card slotYes · Reno9: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Reno9: No
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Reno9: No
- Pixel density442 ppi vs 394 ppi+12%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Main camera aperturef/1.4 vs f/1.8+29%
- Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,080 px+13%
Why is Reno9 better than Mate 50E?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- 5GNo · Mate 50E: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Weight201 g vs 174 g+16%
- Thickness8 mm vs 7.2 mm+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 201 g | 174 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.2 mm |
| Height | 161.5 mm | 162.3 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 74.2 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Colours | Black, Silver, Purple | Black, Gold, Pink gradient, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,412 px |
| Pixel density | 442 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 950 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.6% | 89.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 642L |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.4 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,460 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 99% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | HarmonyOS 3.0 | Android 13 |
| Platform | HarmonyOS | Android |
| Interface | — | ColorOS 13 |
